FSU football: How Mycah Pittman differs from Andrew Parchment

Spring Enrollee and Two Years Eligibility

I’ve written about it several times, but Andrew Parchment not enrolling in the spring was something I had concerns about last year. He also only had one year of eligibility remaining.

The difference with Pittman is he should be a spring enrollee and has two years of eligibility left. Pittman enrolling in the spring will allow him to experience FSU’s spring practice while getting some valuable reps with the team and their quarterbacks.

That rapport will continue through the summer with player-led workouts, and more reps will take place in fall camp. That’s a lot different than what Parchment experienced last year.

He was essentially learning the offense on the fly, not to mention the QB carousel the Noles had going on in the first few games.

Mycah Pittman is a good take for the coaches because he checks a lot of boxes. Pittman brings experience, is physically ready to play, is a spring enrollee, and is someone who can contribute in more than one way.

He’s the third transfer portal player for this recruiting cycle, and I’d anticipate the Noles targeting at least one more wide receiver from the portal. Despite the disadvantage of not enrolling in the spring and issues at the quarterback position early in the year, Parchment still had 24 receptions for 350 yards and two touchdowns.  Knowing that, I think it’s possible to expect Pittman to have even better numbers